by davecana » Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:27 pm
OK, so that's 80 tonnes ,or 80,000 Kg of juice. 1 Kg of juice is 1.28435 lts, so that was 102748 ltrs of juice burnt.
The burn rate was 7342 ltrs an hr.
At cruise the distance traveled is 913 Km per hour, so it burns 8 ltrs per Km.
If your flying in a 787-8, at max capacity of 381 pax in single class config, each pax is using .021 ltr, or 21 ml per Km. This is equal to a car with one passenger getting 47.6 Km/lt, or 2.1 lts/100Km.
If your flying in a 787-9 at capacity of 280 pax, then each pax is using .0285 ltr, or 28.5 ml per Km. Equal to a car with one passenger getting 35.1 Km/lt, or 2.85 lts/100Km.
And if your in a 787-10 at a capacity of 323 pax, then each pax is using .0247 ltr, or 24.7 ml per Km. Equal to a car with one passenger getting 40.5 Km/lt, or 2.47 lts/100Km.
Definitely cheaper than driving that distance, if you could, and a s%@t load quicker.
Something to compare it to,
Kingair 350, and also me assuming a fuel burn of half what it uses on the ground at max power. Max power on the ground is about 620 lb per hour per engine. So I will assume a combined fuel burn of 620 lb total for both engines together at FL350.
620 lb is 308 lts of fuel burnt per hour, and the distance traveled is 580 Km, this is max cruise according to beech.
This is .531 ltrs per Km, which sounds a lot less than the 8 ltrs burnt by the 787, but then you generally will only be carrying 10 pax, depending on config. This works out for each pax using .053 ltr, or 53 ml per Km, pretty much 2 1/2 times the fuel per passenger. This is 18.9 Km/lt, or 5.29 lts/100Km. Equal to what a modern euro diesel gets nowadays.
Dash8's ands SAAB's etc fall closer to the Kingair end of the spectrum than the big boys.