More F-35 critiquing

General topic discussion forum for all A/CAMers. Get it off your chest!!

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:53 pm

:lol:
Comical.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:25 pm

The reason why it is comical: conjecture.

If you believe a manufacturer will release anything tactical about a military product on a brochure...
Or in the free press...
Or in military magazines...

Well, of course they will, BH. Of course they will.

Bahahahahaha!

Comical.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Capt NG » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:33 pm

Question.. What's the perception from our northern neighbours on the JSF?

Salty.. The military do release that info.. Just go check AMI.. They're all over it like a rash on a pimps proverbial.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:36 pm

4 out of 5 Northern Neighbours have diarrhoea.

And none of them like it.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby _BlackHawk_ » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:16 pm

Salty wrote:The reason why it is comical: conjecture.

If you believe a manufacturer will release anything tactical about a military product on a brochure...
Or in the free press...
Or in military magazines...

Well, of course they will, BH. Of course they will.

Bahahahahaha!

Comical.


Well duh. As I said, we might never know it can (or can't) actually do all the things that LM says it can until shots are fired. Considering Israel is a customer, we might just get that chance.
_BlackHawk_
 

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:28 pm

And...Like I said...small risk they'll ask you to strap one on, so why on earth would you possibly be compelled to express an opinion on something that you have incomplete (blunt) information about?

I guess I could wax lyrical about Jackson Pollock and abstract expressionism, but I wouldn't, coz I have no idea about it.

But by all means, continue along your path. I need a laugh, and the blokes I know that are still RAAF active (but cannot talk about the F-35) need a laugh too.

You are really a very funny fellow.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby _BlackHawk_ » Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:59 pm

Salty wrote:And...Like I said...small risk they'll ask you to strap one on, so why on earth would you possibly be compelled to express an opinion on something that you have incomplete (blunt) information about?

I guess I could wax lyrical about Jackson Pollock and abstract expressionism, but I wouldn't, coz I have no idea about it.

But by all means, continue along your path. I need a laugh, and the blokes I know that are still RAAF active (but cannot talk about the F-35) need a laugh too.

You are really a very funny fellow.


...because this is a discussion forum for talking about aircraft and other things. If it were a prerequisite that you must have flown any aircraft to discuss it, then the forums would be a pretty quiet place.
_BlackHawk_
 

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby oz rb fan » Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:03 pm

_BlackHawk_ wrote:
Salty wrote:And...Like I said...small risk they'll ask you to strap one on, so why on earth would you possibly be compelled to express an opinion on something that you have incomplete (blunt) information about?

I guess I could wax lyrical about Jackson Pollock and abstract expressionism, but I wouldn't, coz I have no idea about it.

But by all means, continue along your path. I need a laugh, and the blokes I know that are still RAAF active (but cannot talk about the F-35) need a laugh too.

You are really a very funny fellow.


...because this is a discussion forum for talking about aircraft and other things. If it were a prerequisite that you must have flown any aircraft to discuss it, then the forums would be a pretty quiet place.

bugger i'm out...my dad just built them....... :D :lol:

btw this argument was used in the 70'sabout the f111.....the best bang for buck this country has paid for defense.....nope not an f35 fan......typhoons and supper bugs would be a great way for us to go
oz rb fan
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby _BlackHawk_ » Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:12 pm

Didn't we get the F-111 for 10 million per aircraft or close to it? It was a ridiculous bargain considering their service. I remember cutting apart my former lecturer at University when he started popping off about how bad the F-111 was.
_BlackHawk_
 

Re: More F-35 critiquing

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:33 pm

...because this is a discussion forum for talking about aircraft and other things. If it were a prerequisite that you must have flown any aircraft to discuss it, then the forums would be a pretty quiet place.


But you are not talking.

As per your post's topic, you are writing a critique about a fighter whose capabilities are classified.
So I guess its really "A blunt's view of why Australia shouldn't buy the F-35".
If you don't like the look of the jet, its colour, it does not have an ashtray...OK...that's cool.

Crap on all you like about the F111 and how you cut down a uni lecturer. At least its a post-mortem of the jet and the facts are able to be viewed.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Crew Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

cron