Ansett A330 wrote:From a Safety and Risk point of view the "Winner" (or is it Weiner?) should be the one who minimises "overspray" and "splashback".
tor lives wrote:Ummmm what???
TOR
Adam the Akrodude wrote:I vote HRTPaul wins the pissing contest - LAMEs always win.
Ansett A330 wrote:From a Safety and Risk point of view the "Winner" (or is it Weiner?) should be the one who minimises "overspray" and "splashback".
VH-WAL wrote:Ansett A330 wrote:From a Safety and Risk point of view the "Winner" (or is it Weiner?) should be the one who minimises "overspray" and "splashback".
for the over 60's don't forget the "dribbles" and backward flying minor streams
Adam the Akrodude wrote:VH-WAL wrote:Ansett A330 wrote:From a Safety and Risk point of view the "Winner" (or is it Weiner?) should be the one who minimises "overspray" and "splashback".
for the over 60's don't forget the "dribbles" and backward flying minor streams
Just tie it in a knot mate - saves from it dragging along the ground too - just sayin'.
Cap'n Wannabe wrote:It'd only drag on the ground if you chopped 'is legs orf!
VH-WAL wrote:
you been looking!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests