1/32 DH-89

A membership discussion forum for all things modelling.

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby tor lives » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:47 pm

hrtpaul wrote:
Adam the Akrodude wrote:This is absolutely outstanding! From DH-89 to F-4 versus F-8 discussion - brilliant!

I am guilty as charged and would have had my ass kicked on another forum over this most outrageous thread drift! :D I do find it interesting and amusing to see how a discussion starts about something and morphs in to something else entirely. Ross, you're going to have to give us your details so we can have a good yak when you are down this way - thread drifts guaranteed!

Ray, I have to say your Jen/Susan comparison to F-8/F-4 had me in tears sir! :lol:

It's alright Paul, I understand your chagrin. F-4 drivers often did get to see F-8's in their rear view mirrors to the west of Miramar! Being the true thoroughbred that this bird was, it's worst attribute was landing it back on the boat. It had the highest accident rate in this regard - part of it's mystic and charisma! Must have been terrifying trying to land a Crusader on the smaller "27 Charlie" carriers at night with a pitching deck with only a 11 foot ramp to hook clearance. I've read that quite a few ex-Crusader pilots had heart conditions later in life from all the stress they went through flying Crusaders. The worst Crusader was the "J" model - upgraded from the "E". It received special boundary layer controls blowing air over the wings to lower approach speed plus a larger fin. This made the aeroplane a complete dog and unfit for carrier use - big mistake. Imagine designing an aeroplane with the approach speed lower than the speed that the RAT can operate. Loose the generator on approach at night and it's all over! The C and E performed outstandingly over Nth Vietnam and the VNAF were scared of the Crusader. One MiG-17 pilot when seeing that he was being chased by an F-8 decided to eject!

I liken the F-8 to a muscle car like a Mustang, Challenger or Camaro, with the F-4 being something like a SRT Jeep Cherokee! F-8 - gorgeous design, with nifty wing. F-4 looks like it came out of a steel forge with bent up wingtips and bent down tail and smoking like a steelworks stack - big, powerful, brutish with a smoke trail that could be seen for miles! One had finesse, the other brute force and strength! Both jets are complete legends - as were those that flew over Nth Vietnam in particular. I take back my comment about building only one F-4 in 1/32. I'd like to also build a Blue Angels F-4J, flown by Cdr Harley Hall who lead the team in 1970 and went back to the fleet and was shot down over Vietnam at the end of the war in 1973 and still listed as MIA.

Once gain you keep telling yourself that :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Think I will be sending you a Susan Boyle CD young Paul.....just to help you keep things in perspective where this debate is concerned :D
TOR
tor lives
 
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby hrtpaul » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:54 pm

I guess I'll send you a stool sample then in return. Ya know.............................."just to help you keep things in perspective where this debate is concerned" :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P
Head A/CAM Phantom Phanatic, Shit Stirrer and Karma Bus Driver toot fkn toot :twisted:
hrtpaul
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:44 am
Location: Like I'm gonna tell you lot

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby tor lives » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:08 pm

hrtpaul wrote:I guess I'll send you a stool sample then in return. Ya know.............................."just to help you keep things in perspective where this debate is concerned" :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P


I appreciate the gesture, no really I do......but that would be the best part of you gone for the day :D
TOR
tor lives
 
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby Adam the Akrodude » Mon Nov 09, 2015 8:20 am

Looks like we have one very sensitive F-4 aficionado here folks so I'll try like Fred to haul this discussion back on track. How about this beautiful Dragon Rapide that was extensively re-built over many years down at Moorabbin by Maurice Rolfe. My Laser used to live in this hangar and for a few years I watched this beautiful aeroplane come back together - truly a labour of love.

Looks like Maurice driving here.

Image

Start up a little rich!

Image
Adam the Akrodude
 
Posts: 2819
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:02 pm
Location: 100,124,672,897 Bifrost Rd, Valhalla, Asgard

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby Cap'n Wannabe » Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:52 pm

Somewhere I have some photos of VH-UXB from behind, as I taxied out behind her for her maiden flight...I'll see if I can find them!
Pretending to do it TAC style with the big boys since 1987
Also, we don't need no steenkin' VLATs!
Cap'n Wannabe
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Craigieburn, Victoria

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby hrtpaul » Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:09 pm

Adam the Akrodude wrote:Looks like we have one very sensitive F-4 aficionado here folks

The only thing I'm sensitive to is bullshit mate :)
Head A/CAM Phantom Phanatic, Shit Stirrer and Karma Bus Driver toot fkn toot :twisted:
hrtpaul
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:44 am
Location: Like I'm gonna tell you lot

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby Adam the Akrodude » Mon Nov 09, 2015 4:13 pm

hrtpaul wrote:
Adam the Akrodude wrote:Looks like we have one very sensitive F-4 aficionado here folks

The only thing I'm sensitive to is bullshit mate :)


Dude, you put yourself out there as the resident "Shit Stirrer", yet you can't handle any stirring - what the...? If you dish it out, you've got to take it right. Outside of having what I thought was some light-hearted banter (perhaps mainly at your expense regarding the F-4 and your deep passion for this mighty aerial beast), where have I been bullshitting? C'mon, how have I upset thee? Jeez, never knew LAME's were so "sensitive"! C'mon, admit Ray's F-8/F-4 - Jen/Adele analogy was pretty funny! I almost sprayed coffee all over my office when reading it! :lol:
Adam the Akrodude
 
Posts: 2819
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:02 pm
Location: 100,124,672,897 Bifrost Rd, Valhalla, Asgard

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby tor lives » Mon Nov 09, 2015 7:44 pm

OK guys.....I am detecting a slight change in tone here. I think we might cool it for a while hey.
TOR
tor lives
 
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: 1/32 DH-89

Postby RHB785 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:23 am

:D, Coming back onto topic, that Rapide truly is a work of art. I don't have enough superlatives in my vocabulary to justly describe a beautifully rebuilt and airworthy De Havilland 1920s-1930s designed biplane or any other airworthy preserved aeroplane from the Golden Age of aviation regardless of country of origin and regardless of whether it's a biplane or monoplane.

There have also been some beautiful post WW2 designs such as the 1940s and 1950s Cessnas, Pipers, Beechs, Antonovs and Yaks and many other post war designs but the 'tween wars types just seem to hold a fascination for me. Don't ask me why because I couldn't tell you. Very subjective I know but that's just me. I guess I just like anything from that earlier age; aeroplanes, cars, motor bikes, trucks, trains, aircraft and car engines, stationary engines you name it, it's on my "likes" list.

Regards,
RHB.
RHB785
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:52 pm

Previous

Return to Model Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests