Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

A membership discussion forum for all things modelling.

Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby F-27pax » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:35 am

Some advice from the hive mind please.

I'm looking at the instructions for the Red Roo kit of the Ansett Airlines of Australia DC-9-30. There I read that one needs to add 2mm to the engine pylons. Is this simply that Fly forgot to make their engine pylons as long as they should be or were Australian DC-9s different from the rest in this direction? Does this mean that I have to add 2mm to the engine pylonss of all my Fly Model DC-9s (of which I have quite a few)?

Leigh
F-27pax
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:40 pm

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby Cap'n Wannabe » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:40 am

FWIW it also says to add a 2mm spacer on the TAA instructions.
Pretending to do it TAC style with the big boys since 1987
Also, we don't need no steenkin' VLATs!
Cap'n Wannabe
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Craigieburn, Victoria

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby tor lives » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:47 am

It is an identified problem with the Fly DC-9, but it can be easily rectified with the aftermarket Contrails JT8/DC-9 engine set.
http://www.contrailsmodels.com/Engines.html
TOR
tor lives
 
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby Cap'n Wannabe » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:18 am

I guess the bonus B-52 engine set that came with my TAA sample is pretty useless then.. :lol:
Pretending to do it TAC style with the big boys since 1987
Also, we don't need no steenkin' VLATs!
Cap'n Wannabe
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Craigieburn, Victoria

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby Graeme H » Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:36 pm

The problem is that Fly made the pylons too close to the fuselage more like the MD80, which is much closer than on DC9's, you need to space them out, I usually use a piece sprue and sand it down

ImageFly DC9 Pic 3 by qfa_tsv, on Flickr

ImageDSCF3439 by qfa_tsv, on Flickr
Graeme
User avatar
Graeme H
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:51 pm
Location: YBTL TSV

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby F-27pax » Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:10 am

Thanks for the comments fellow plasticeers. I think I'll take TOR's advice and give the Contrails engines a go. Their JT3Ds for DC-8s proved to be excellent so I am happy with their product. They've been ordered, all I have to do now is wait.
Leigh
F-27pax
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:40 pm

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby Graeme H » Thu Apr 19, 2018 1:40 pm

Wuss :D
Graeme
User avatar
Graeme H
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:51 pm
Location: YBTL TSV

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby tor lives » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:58 pm

Graeme H wrote:Wuss :D


Seems to me like a common sense decision, it's what I did :D .
TOR
tor lives
 
Posts: 4277
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby F-27pax » Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:01 am

The reason for buying the new engines is because I'm going to be making 6 or 7 DC-9s of various kinds and I would like them to look similar, something that I could not do with so much repeat scratchbuilding.
Leigh
F-27pax
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:40 pm

Re: Red Roo/Fly Models DC-9

Postby RayS » Fri Apr 20, 2018 7:54 am

Well, fortunately, I only have one of these kits so scratch building will be the go for me.

I wonder if there is an enterprising resin producer that could make up a master to correct these kit pylons :?:
Ray

Image
User avatar
RayS
 
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:24 am
Location: RAdelaide!... YPAD

Next

Return to Model Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests