787 fuel burn

General topic discussion forum for all A/CAMers. Get it off your chest!!

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Capt NG » Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:56 pm

Commodore?... Ah well, I guess if 4 out of 5 people get diarrhoea then I guess at least 1 enjoys it? :roll:
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:12 pm

Emirates have asked to have their 380's re-engined with RR.
As much as I love 4 engines, I have to say the 787 is awesome (apart from the electrical fire thing).
Stu knows the numbers I gave him last night ref: the 380 fuel burn Vs pax load...it's quite shocking.
207,000kg fuel burn LAX-MEL. 480 pax. 15hrs 10mins flight time.

I wounder what precipitated the Emirates move from 350 to 777X?

I know the tripler is a ripper, and Boeing is very disappointed at the 747-800 sales, but its not that surprising.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Capt NG » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:27 pm

I remember in the 90's anybody who had a Cathay interview read up on the RB211.. Triple spool, better efficiency etc..

I think your right mate about the 747-8.. The worlds moving away from prolific 4 engine operations..the big twins will be the workhorses in years to come.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Knotty » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:37 pm

Good discussion men , hey Salty .......my mate at work thanks you for an early fuel figure on Saturday to LAX 200 ton . He was off it early ,and had time for a cuppa he said !!! ;) ;) we did Emirates last night to DXB ......237,000 odd litres , glad I'm not paying for it . 787 to DPS the other day ......33 ton ......beat that hey ......unbelievable !!! . The old Ansett 767-200s were 50 ton every time for the same trip . ;)
Knotty
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:39 am

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:42 pm

HAH! Yep 200 it was.
Do you lads get on the interphone to check with us or is it the engineers?

Gets so stupid busy up there I never get time to come down do a meet'n greet with the gas dudes.

Thanks for the JUICE!
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Capt NG » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm

Yeah... It's busy upstairs eating sandwiches and drinking coffee mate..no time for the real workers.. I always wonder onto the Tarmac and talk shit with knotty and his mates... :lol:
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:47 pm

That's coz you a domestic goddess princess, Cinderella.

There.

And you a Ng VC.
:)
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Capt NG » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:56 pm

:lol: ... VC NG... I like it...hey at least with you and I if the mouth opens sarcasm drops out.. With others it's stupidity.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby wombatair » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:57 pm

Wonder why the LIP :twisted: gave the 787s to QF main opposition? :(

Opps sorry QF's baby. :twisted:

But I think we know the answer??? :o

LL
wombatair
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: 787 fuel burn

Postby Nillus » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:02 pm

The environment in there makes you feel ill now, LL.
You left with some good vibes...its "not so much" now :(


Welcome aboard by the way.

Yes, VCNG, its better than the alternative.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Crew Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests