I know this is a little outside the general interest of this group, but I think a interesting development nonetheless - particularly since many Bronco's have been pressed into other roles since leaving military service (fire FAC'ing as one example).
I read this morning that two Bronco's have been used in action in Syria as a trial recently. This I find amazing as the type has been out of military use for some time. A little known fact is that Cessna 337s (O-2s) have been in use for some time over Iraq working directly for the CIA. One ex-105 pilot I corresponded with some time ago flew 337s in the role over Iraq and he said they were way more efficient than drones. The reason is drones have such a narrow field of view and it is very common for drones to fly directly over a target and not see it. The whole "human" element works better as the human eye can just pick up subtle changes in a environment - something very difficult for drone operators to do half a world away in their air conditioned offices. The 337 teams lived on the same base as the "client" as well and this provided a much better working relationship. So, this trial of re-furbed Broncos in Syria suggests to me there is a short fall in performance/capability with certain drone ISR operations over in the "Great Sandpit". Perhaps when the USAF is unable to provide the required support for agencies like the CIA, they just go ahead and sort out their own solution to the task.
Is the USAF looking at developing a light ISR/light CAS aircraft I wonder? It could be argued that even the A-10 with the mighty GAU-8 is a overkill to taking out insurgents on motorbikes, hiding in trees, etc. The USAF has traditionally abhorred light special purpose aircraft - yet when required in the field, always seems to have to re-invent the wheel in this regard (A-1 "SPAD", A-37, F-5, OV-10). The A-10 has found a niche to prolong its survival morphing from tank killer to dedicated insurgent killer. Whilst only flying a fraction of CAS missions, it nonetheless is providing a very special service to troops in contact. The F-35 is going to do most jobs it's tasked with very well. Those jobs that require getting down in the mud and dust I can't see it doing quite as well as prior specialist aircraft that get down in the weeds to do their job, however dangerous this is. The F-35 I just cannot see getting down low - it's just way way too valuable to task taking out low value targets at elevated risk. Combat SAR is another thing the Hog pilots specialise in, requiring low level op's.
I just find it fascinating that regardless of all this new high tech, there are just some jobs where it appears you cannot beat the Mk.1 eyeball.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/09/why-is-america-using-these-antique-planes-to-fight-isis.html?via=mobile&source=email